Building Inclusive Research: How Organizations Are Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials

Building Inclusive Research: How Organizations Are Increasing Diversity in Clinical Trials

Ensuring diversity in clinical trials is crucial for the development of safe, effective treatments for all population groups. When certain demographics are underrepresented—especially racial and ethnic minorities, women, and older adults—the resulting treatments may not work as effectively for everyone, risking unforeseen side effects or reduced efficacy. In response, various organizations, regulatory bodies, and research institutions have recognized this gap and are implementing strategies to foster more inclusive research.

Why Diversity in Clinical Trials Matters

Diverse clinical trials allow researchers to understand how different populations respond to medical treatments. Genetic, environmental, and sociocultural factors can influence how diseases progress and how treatments work. For instance, medications may metabolize differently across ethnic groups, and some conditions affect specific populations more than others. When clinical trials don’t account for these variables, the risk of health disparities grows, leading to a healthcare system that may inadequately serve large portions of the population.

In the case of blood pressure medications, African American patients often respond better to certain types of drugs than other populations. Without diverse trial data, effective medications may go unprescribed, contributing to disproportionately high rates of uncontrolled hypertension in these communities.

Current Landscape of Diversity in Clinical Trials

The latest U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data shows that while women now represent over half of clinical trial participants, significant racial and ethnic disparities remain. A 2022 analysis revealed:

  • Racial Demographics: 75% of participants were White, 8% were Black or African American, 6% were Asian, and 11% were Hispanic.
  • Older Adults: Only 30% of participants were aged 65 and older, although they make up a considerable share of those who ultimately use these treatments.

These disparities underscore the importance of ongoing diversity initiatives in clinical trials to close gaps and ensure medical treatments reflect the real-world population.

Organizational Initiatives to Enhance Clinical Trial Diversity

FDA’s Efforts Toward Diversity Action Plans

In recent years, the FDA has taken significant steps to promote diversity in clinical trials:

  • Guidance on Diversity Action Plans: In 2024, the FDA issued draft guidance urging drug manufacturers to develop diversity action plans, setting measurable goals for participant demographics and strategies for reaching these targets. This guidance encourages companies to design trials that mirror the populations likely to use the treatments.
  • Drug Trials Snapshots: Since 2015, the FDA’s Drug Trials Snapshots program has shared demographic data on trial participants for newly approved drugs. This transparency incentivizes sponsors to address diversity gaps and highlights areas needing improvement.

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Programs

The NIH has been proactive in fostering diversity through several key programs:

  • Inclusion Across the Lifespan Policy: This policy mandates that NIH-funded clinical research includes individuals of all ages unless there are valid scientific or ethical reasons for exclusion. By focusing on older populations, the NIH aims to make research findings applicable across all age groups.
  • Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL): Established in response to COVID-19 disparities, the NIH’s CEAL program collaborates with community leaders to build trust and encourage trial participation among underrepresented groups. CEAL has been particularly impactful in Black and Hispanic communities, where historical mistrust of medical research remains high.

PhRMA’s Industry Guidelines for Inclusive Research

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) represents the leading biopharmaceutical companies and has outlined strategies to diversify clinical trial participation:

  • Engaging Trusted Community Health Centers: PhRMA encourages companies to collaborate with community health centers and local pharmacies, making trials more accessible for participants. By meeting patients in familiar, trusted settings, researchers can increase enrollment among historically underserved groups.
  • Diverse Investigator Pools: Recognizing that participants often feel more comfortable with researchers who share similar backgrounds, PhRMA promotes recruiting investigators and staff from diverse demographics. This approach fosters cultural competence and reduces unintentional biases.

Yale Center for Clinical Investigation (YCCI)

Yale’s Cultural Ambassadors Program, established in 2010, partners with local community organizations in New Haven to increase diversity in clinical trials. Cultural Ambassadors—community leaders and members—serve as liaisons, helping researchers engage with minority populations and improve understanding about clinical research. The program has significantly increased participation among African American and Hispanic communities, demonstrating how trust-building can make research more inclusive.

Decentralized Clinical Trials: Reaching Remote and Underrepresented Populations

The Decentralized Trials & Research Alliance (DTRA) has made strides by promoting decentralized trials, which rely on telemedicine and home-based participation. This approach removes logistical barriers such as transportation and childcare, which disproportionately affect underrepresented groups. By conducting trials remotely, DTRA has seen a measurable increase in diverse enrollments, particularly among rural and low-income communities.

Overcoming Barriers to Participation: Challenges and Solutions

Achieving true diversity in clinical trials involves tackling a range of logistical, social, and economic barriers. Here’s a look at some common challenges and innovative solutions:

  1. Trust Issues: Decades of unethical medical research practices, such as the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, have fostered deep-seated mistrust among certain populations. To combat this, the NIH, PhRMA, and other organizations have increased community engagement efforts, partnering with trusted local figures to build relationships and transparency.
  2. Logistical Barriers: Transportation, time constraints, and financial costs are often prohibitive. Organizations are providing resources such as transportation vouchers, childcare services, and stipends to alleviate these burdens. Decentralized trials, as promoted by the DTRA, further remove physical and financial barriers.
  3. Regulatory Challenges: Strict regulatory requirements can make it difficult to incorporate diverse participants, particularly those with underlying health conditions. The FDA is working to streamline these requirements and ensure that ethical standards do not inadvertently prevent diverse participation.

Global Efforts to Increase Clinical Trial Diversity

While much of the focus has been U.S.-based, other countries are also recognizing the importance of diversity in clinical research. In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has launched the INCLUDE project, which develops guidelines for researchers on how to design more inclusive trials. In Japan, the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) has issued new guidance emphasizing the importance of racial diversity to improve the applicability of Japanese drug trials to international populations.

Artificial Intelligence Role

Identifying Eligible and Diverse Participants

  • Data Analysis and Insights: AI-driven analytics can sift through large amounts of healthcare data (such as electronic health records and social determinants of health) to identify eligible patients from diverse backgrounds who might otherwise be overlooked. This approach ensures that recruitment efforts reach a wider demographic, including those in underserved or remote communities.
  • Predictive Modeling: Machine learning models can predict potential participants based on demographic and health characteristics, helping researchers proactively recruit people from underrepresented groups. AI models can assess individual-level risk factors and specific needs, creating a more personalized and equitable approach to trial inclusion.

Reducing Geographical Barriers with Virtual Trials

  • Decentralized and Virtual Trials: AI-driven telemedicine and digital health tools allow for virtual clinical trials, which reduce the need for participants to travel to a clinical site. This is particularly beneficial for rural populations, individuals with mobility issues, and those who face logistical barriers, such as lack of transportation or time off work. By making trials more accessible, AI helps broaden the participant pool and encourages greater diversity.
  • AI Chatbots and Digital Assistants: AI-powered tools can guide patients through trial procedures, requirements, and even consent processes, ensuring that participants fully understand the trial before joining. This helps reduce dropout rates and ensures sustained participation from diverse groups who may have different levels of familiarity with clinical research.

Addressing Language and Cultural Barriers

  • Natural Language Processing (NLP): AI can translate study materials and communications into multiple languages, making trials more accessible to non-English-speaking populations. NLP algorithms can also analyze cultural nuances in language, helping researchers frame information in a culturally sensitive manner that resonates with diverse participants.
  • Sentiment Analysis: AI tools can assess sentiment in communication, helping researchers understand the concerns and motivations of participants from different backgrounds. For instance, sentiment analysis can reveal potential trust issues, allowing researchers to address these with targeted outreach or education.

Monitoring and Ensuring Equitable Outcomes

  • Algorithmic Bias Detection: AI models can help identify and correct biases in trial recruitment, data collection, and analysis by flagging any skewed data patterns. This is especially important for ensuring that diverse populations receive safe and effective treatments based on accurate data.
  • Adaptive Trial Design: AI algorithms can adjust recruitment efforts in real-time if specific demographic groups are underrepresented. For instance, if certain ethnic groups are lagging in participation, AI can suggest focused recruitment strategies to balance the demographics, thus achieving a representative trial cohort.

Improving Retention Through Personalized Engagement

  • Tailored Communication: AI can help tailor communications and follow-ups to each participant’s preferences, ensuring that participants feel understood and valued throughout the trial. This personalized engagement increases retention, which is crucial in trials where diverse populations are involved.
  • Predicting Dropout Risk: AI can assess factors that may lead to participant dropout and proactively provide solutions to mitigate these risks. For instance, AI might flag participants who have missed appointments and send reminders or offer additional resources, ensuring that diverse participants stay involved through the trial’s completion.

Analyzing Social Determinants of Health

  • Holistic Health Data Collection: AI can incorporate social determinants of health (SDOH) such as income level, housing stability, and access to healthcare. By analyzing these factors, AI can identify potential barriers to participation for certain groups and allow trial organizers to tailor their approach based on the unique challenges faced by each demographic.
  • Predictive Demographics Modeling: By using SDOH data alongside clinical information, AI can model health disparities more accurately and predict how diverse demographics may experience different health outcomes. This ensures that trials account for broader, real-life factors affecting participants’ health.

Ethical Considerations and Transparency

  • Ensuring Fair Use of AI: AI brings with it the risk of replicating existing biases. To mitigate this, organizations use AI models designed to ensure fairness and transparency in participant selection. Oversight committees and bias audits help verify that algorithms do not inadvertently exclude certain groups.
  • Transparency in AI Decision-Making: Providing transparency about AI-driven recruitment methods can build trust among potential participants, especially those from communities historically wary of clinical research. This transparency fosters inclusivity by helping individuals feel assured about the fairness and safety of the trial processes.

Applications and Progress

Several companies and research organizations are already implementing AI in clinical trials to improve diversity. For example:

  • Deep 6 AI is using machine learning algorithms to search through EHR data and identify diverse patients for clinical trials, focusing on reducing recruitment timelines and increasing demographic inclusivity.
  • Pharmaceutical firms like Novartis have implemented AI-driven patient recruitment tools to ensure that trials reach diverse and representative populations, aiming to improve the generalizability of their results.

Future Directions for Diversity in Clinical Trials

As diversity in clinical trials continues to gain attention, emerging technologies and methodologies are likely to play a key role. Artificial intelligence can help identify and reach eligible, diverse participants based on demographics and health history, while digital health tools like wearable devices allow for continuous monitoring, expanding trial participation options.

To achieve health equity, organizations will need to continuously assess their strategies and adapt to the changing landscape. Commitment from the highest levels of leadership, combined with a community-focused approach, will be essential to building a research environment where every voice is heard and represented.

For those looking to participate

If you are looking to participate in diverse clinical trials or learn more, the following resources can provide guidance:

Local Health Centers: Many community health centers now partner with research institutions to offer nearby clinical trial opportunities.

ClinicalTrials.gov: A global database listing both private and publicly funded clinical studies, with options to search by location, demographic needs, and medical condition.

ResearchMatch.org: A national registry connecting volunteers with researchers across various studies.


Are you interested in how AI is changing healthcare? Subscribe to our newsletter, “PulsePoint,” for updates, insights, and trends on AI innovations in healthcare.

💻 Stay Informed with PulsePoint!

Enter your email to receive our most-read newsletter, PulsePoint. No fluff, no hype —no spam, just what matters.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

💻 Stay Informed with PulsePoint!

Enter your email to receive our most-read newsletter, PulsePoint. No fluff, no hype —no spam, just what matters.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Leave a Reply